We are all familiar with the phrase, “I’m sorry but the guarantee has run out so there’s nothing we can do”. This is often a complete lie – at least in many cases. If the manufacturer’s engineer says it then technically it is true because they have no obligation under the sale of goods act – but the retailer does. Retailers can’t just fob us off. Here is just one example which proves that this response is not always true.
Expensive coffee machine example
A Which? member bought an “expensive” coffee machine and after 30 months it broke down suffering a serious fault. This is 18 months out of guarantee. However, Which? advised him that an expensive coffee machine should be expected to last more than 2 and a half years so he was entitled to have it repaired free of charge by the retailer who had sold him a product that was not of satisfactory quality.
Had the fault been relatively minor the advice may have been different, likewise, if the coffee machine had been a cheap one, or it had been used in an abnormally heavy way such as in a works canteen. We can’t take it for granted that any fault on any appliance at 2 and a half years should be repaired free of charge under the sale of goods act, but it’s useful to have real life examples like this as a yard stick because it can help us gauge our own circumstances.
Out of guarantee appliances
When relating to washing machines or other white goods appliances it will depend on how much it cost, how it has been used, and what’s gone wrong. If you buy an expensive appliance (especially a brand which sells on a high quality image) which suffers an expensive breakdown after a few years you may be entitled to a free repair if you have used it normally and looked after it. I have heard of people winning cases when drum bearings have failed on washing machines almost 5 years old.
Conversely, if you paid £199 for a budget washer, and used it every day – twice a day – to wash for a family of 5 and it is exhausted and scrap after 3 years, it may well be that this is acceptable due to the cheapness of the appliance and the hard life it’s had. Even with such a short life it would have only cost £66 per year – £1.27 a week. I would think £1.27 a week to do 14 washes is pretty reasonable. So it’s necessary to try and look at the whole picture before deciding if you should be disgruntled or not.
Consumer Rights Act 2015 doesn’t cover all breakdowns
It’s important to be aware that the sale of goods act does not say that an appliance or product should never break down, or even that it shouldn’t break down before a certain time period (other than the first 6 months in which case it would be deemed to have an inherent fault). It says they should last a reasonable time and be free from inherent faults.
Relatively minor faults are not the issue in my opinion, it’s very expensive faults – especially those that aren’t economical to repair or cannot be repaired by design. Sadly, too much is open to (mis)interpretation and most retailer’s staff still say there’s nothing they can do once it is out of guarantee, but this is completely untrue in many cases. They too often completely ignore their responsibilities under the sale of goods act.
Another example
Here’s another example (from Which? legal). A customer had an automatic garage door fitted, which came with a 2 year guarantee. During the guarantee a part failed twice and was replaced. However, when the same part failed again 8 months outside the guarantee the company claimed he had to pay because it was out of guarantee. Which? said this was untrue. Under the Sale of Goods act goods should be of satisfactory quality and this includes being durable, so the same part failing 3 times in 3 years is definitely not complying.
Which? advised him he was entitled to a free repair. In this case, the company involved still refused so he was able to claim from the credit card company who eventually agreed it was jointly liable under section 75 of the Credit Act. If they hadn’t agreed to pay, he would have had to take the garage company to the small claims court.
There’s another example of a customer with an iPhone which was 4 months out of guarantee faced with a £130 bill because the on off switch went faulty. She eventually got compensation for the repair costs (with help from Which?) from T-mobile who had repeatedly refused to accept any liability. They eventually paid up when taken to the small claims court (without accepting any liability).
Is this why we have so much trouble getting appliances repaired or replaced when faulty?
The current system doesn’t work properly because it relies on the good will of the retailer to own up and admit they have a responsibility to repair or replace some appliances when they are out of the manufacturers guarantee. In practice, because the manufacturer has no obligation under the sale of goods act then once their guarantee has run out they tend to wash their hands of any problems. The retailers are then left to to foot the entire bill, and they don’t like it. For a more in depth look at this problem see here – Is the sale of goods act too hard on retailers?
More on sale of goods and consumer issues
Repairs
Fixed-price repairs, Pay monthly options, Repair & protect your whole appliance..
Save Money Now
Subscribe to Which? today and start saving money now. Subscription offers often available.
Spares
Spares4Appliances is a spares company run by repair engineers who understand all about spare parts for appliances.
Can I ask a new question please? I have extended warranty with Domestic & General, who employed Whirlpool to send an engineer to look at our Cannon gas freestanding cooker. I claim the cooker main oven heats hotter on the left, and thereby has damaged the side panel because it’s blistered all over from the heat, the right side is unaffected. The engineer turned on the two largest cooker hobs, the dual purpose small oven/grill and the main oven reg 8.
I turned it down to 6. He made his way towards the door and told me it’s got to be on for one hour. I was shocked, he said he’s going to other jobs. After an hour (4.30pm) he called to say, he was busy and would be another half hour. I asked him if I could turn it off for a while because I was very hot. I wasn’t happy he left me to do the test. He said no, I couldn’t turn it off for a while. At 5pm he called and told me he was still not ready and would be half an hour I told him I was not willing to continue today. He suggested the next day, I said no, Friday. He agreed.
I had to put it off for a few days because it was horribly hot and I was anxious. He wasn’t very careful when he lit the cooker hob rings because there were canisters either side of the cooker and I had to dash forward to retrieve them because they were near the flames and it was dangerous.
On Friday he called me one hour before he was due to arrive, so I could copy his test. I turned on the cooker and after an hour he arrived. When he got here he noticed I’d lit the small oven and not the grill. He turned it to grill and was wiggling a thermometer between the cooker and the side panel. After about half an hour of doing this, the cooker was all lit up still, I went to walk to the door turned to look over my shoulder and noticed the overhead fitted units had blistered really badly. They looked like molten cheese under a grill.
They had bubbled and blistered. The engineer wouldn’t admit it was the heat test that did it. The bubbling went down after the heat was off for a while but the overhead door has suffered permanent damaged. I told the engineer I was going to claim from Domestic & General. Find out a couple of months later from Whirlpools own insurance dept he has his own Public Liability Insurance. Whirlpool sent my claim to NIG who I recently received an email from declining my claim. I read with eyes on stalks, his lies to them. He’s not impartial and doesn’t want to get in to trouble, but the lies. I’m so furious and disgusted. I won’t be one of those people who falls away defeated. It’s not so much about the damage to the units now, it’s the fury of his lies.
His insurer even uses quote marks with lies in them. How dare he do that. From the email from his insurer I learn the test should have been performed differently and the engineer put me in potential danger and was negligent. Whirlpool are not helping me with info I require about their test. They don’t want to discuss anything to do with the claim though I tell them of the danger he put me in. I’m going to fight back. I should not have been asked to perform the test myself, it’s an engineer’s job to do a test, I’m just a householder. It’s not my fault I did the test wrong. The engineer told his insurer a person in the gas technical dept in my presence that day told him he could leave me alone for an hour and I was a party to the call. This is a lie, the engineer didn’t speak to anyone on the phone in my presence nor do I remember him being on the phone at all. He names this person and I’ve tried 3 times to speak to him but Whirlpool don’t put calls through.
Phew, obviously there’s more. As an engineer yourself do you have knowledge of householders being left to do tests themselves. The third party is either covering for the incompetent engineer or doesn’t know. Whirlpool will know now because I sent them a copy of the insurers letter setting out the declined claim. That way they will see the dodgy practise. I’m pressing on with this. Any ideas pls? Still haven’t got cooker fixed and extended to 5 years warranty expires in December I think. Whirlpool and Domestic & General shocking to deal with.
Hello Lorna. It sounds very frustrating and complicated. It’s not really about the subject of this article to be fair but I would say firstly that as your policy was with Domestic and General and it was they who sent whirlpool on their behalf then Domestic and General are ultimately responsible. However, in cases like this it is very hard to get a company to be candid and honest about it because of the complicated relationship they have with the person they have sent.
One thing I’m not sure about is these, “tests”. If you just turned on the appliance for an hour before the engineer came I don’t understand how that is carrying out a test? The test would be when the engineer had arrived and started checking temperatures? I do think it is disappointing that an engineer would switch on a gas appliance and then leave it to go to another job when there is no guarantee (as proved to be the case) that he could get back in time, and especially when the complaint was that heat was damaging the surroundings!
I think at the end of the day the manufacturer may well say that if the appliance has been installed exactly as described in their installation instructions that it should be impossible for heat damage to occur to surrounding areas. There are minimum gaps allowed between such an appliance and surrounding areas. That is of course unless there is a fault somewhere. Sometimes this happens where due to a bad design heat from the oven can damage the appliances control knobs and fascia. If the heat damage is to the appliance itself though that’s different unless it has been installed incorrectly.
Unfortunately you are embroiled in a complex case with several different parties so I feel for your situation. It is very difficult when a customer has a dispute with an engineer and that engineer has been sent by an independent third party. It is a nightmare.
Dear Andy, thank you so much for your reply. I was so happy reading what you had to say, and that you actually grasped the problem. You know, I send emails and I can see the other party has either not read them properly, or in some cases hasn’t read it all. Grrr!
Thanks for taking the time to answer.
Two weeks ago I was waiting for a Whirlpool engineer, got a call from the company, the engineer went sick on the job. They arranged for a visit the next day between 10am and 1pm. Waited until 3pm then called them. Guess who was supposed to come both days? Yes, the engineer who damaged my units. He didn’t bother to contact Whirlpool and say he couldn’t do the job because of insurance claim. No, he just ignored me, what a coward, he went sick rather than do my repair. I’m completely nonplussed. I couldn’t have let him in though. The call handler phoned him, messaged him, emailed him and he didn’t respond.
Anyway, waited 2 weeks for a different engineer who attended yesterday. I picked his brains regarding heat tests. I showed him the damage on the left side panel and pointed out the right side was unaffected. I asked him how he does heat tests. He said he puts a thermometer gadget inside the oven at reg 9. Turns on the small dual purpose oven to maximum. He tests between the cooker and the side panel with a probe for 20/25 minutes. He doesn’t turn on the hob rings, nor the grill. He tests the hob rings by putting a gadget in the flames, and the grill with a gadget held above it on the bottom of the fascia panel. I asked if he leaves or stays, he said stays. He saw I was taking notes and I told him I would quote him and asked if he was worried.
I assured him I’m honest and I would quote just as he said. I asked if he would stand by what he said, and he said “yes”. I’d met him before, I don’t know if he will be asked to verify what he said by Whirlpool, but if one tells the truth and knows the test described is a bonafide one, there’s no need to worry. I think probably behind the scenes the engineer, initial M, was asked to explain. Whirlpool won’t talk to me now because of the insurance claim, honestly Andy it would cost a few hundred pounds at most. Whirlpool are shutting me down because though I claimed on M’s public liability insurance, and he’s a contractor, he’s their employee. I know someone (retired) who was a loss adjuster, he says go after Whirlpool and Domestic & General, but Whirlpool first, he thinks they have more liability and that’s why they won’t cooperate answering questions about tests and lots more.
Whirlpool will incriminate themselves if they disclose their engineer did a test that didn’t conform to their rules. Whirlpool have told me to seek legal help. I haven’t gone after them yet, but they are next in my hit list. I’m doing lots of investigating. I’ve contacted BT for a record of incoming calls called a data subject request it will show calls to our landline on 11th May, because the engineer says he called me at 4.30pm to call off the test. In fact we spoke at 5pm and he was still willing to come at 5.30pm. I called it off at 5pm, M will have to explain why he called me at 5pm, as I’ve always maintained he did. Unfortunately to get the info I want from BT takes 4 to 6 weeks. I was given an address to seek same, because they said that might get a response faster. It’s been one and a half weeks since I requested this.
I asked for a test from Whirlpool that D&G identified when I asked them to look at their computer and tell me what the engineer had reported. Info was very scant but mentioned D144. I emailed both Whirlpool Managing Direct UK and Whirlpool under the Freedom of Information Act seeking info on D144. I was informed yesterday on the phone that the Act doesn’t apply to them and it’s an in-house test which they won’t disclose. I knew the Act didn’t really apply, but some big companies may cooperate. It had them running around for two weeks lol. It had someone looking up the Act the caller told me.
Haven’t replied to his insurers NIG yet, but the loss adjuster friend said it’s very difficult to get an insurer to change their minds. He gave me very useful tips though. Simple one, “The gas engineer is not impartial because he doesn’t want to incriminate himself”. I urge your readers who read this, and feel they don’t have a voice when complaining or get a satisfactory outcome, to keep the pressure up. Keep going, not only is it satisfying that you are giving it your best shot, but the outcome may be favourable. I won’t stop until I get a positive outcome. The engineer lied about the test and how it was performed, I will never stop chasing this because of the lies. If the insurer paid up I’d never have known about the incompetence.
I’ve resorted to record, on my iPad phone calls that may be pertinent. I resisted doing that to the engineer who visited yesterday, that’s why I was firm that what he told me he’d stand by, giving him the opportunity there and then to tweak it. I wasn’t trying to catch him out. I know I can go after Whirlpool and D&G but I have my sights on the engineer because he lied and put me in danger with the flawed test. I’m livid he lied. I bristle when I read the insurer’s email. I posted on Trustpilot, (that’s not like me) and got a response from Whirlpool on the site, that was nonsensical and again referred me to get legal advice, but they watch Trustpilot intently and are fast to respond. Pity the poster wasn’t more articulate. He used the word advise three times in a sentence. I’m going to update what I wrote, but unfortunately I think one has to erase the first review to update. I want to keep my first one up longer before I update.
Thank you Andy.
Hi there
I had a kitchen fitted in February 2019 with a Beko washing machine/dryer. I am a single person. Now, first of all, I know Beko is a fairly cheap make and there has been lockdown (maybe more washing), but just before Christmas, it started really moving about and making a loud aeroplane-taking-off noise especially in spin mode! I asked someone to look at it as it’s out of warranty, and they said the drum was broken and I should replace it. However, I feel, even a cheaper washing machine should last longer than 2 years and 10 months. Beko are not being helpful at all. Any suggestions about if this is possible to be fixed/replaced without me having to pay.
Hi Shona. The manufacturer doesn’t have any obligations under consumer law. Only the retailer. I would agree that even a Beko should last longer than 2 yrs 10 months if it’s only been used to wash for one person.
The average life span of a washing machine is reportedly about 7 years these days. The only people you can complain to is the people you bought it from. If it was a kitchen installer they tend to be even worse than retailers at complying with the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
In theory you should be entry to a free repair but the reality is that we are left to fight with reluctant retailers. The best advice is to get help from Citizens advice or Which?
Thanks for your advice. I really appreciate it.
Good morning Andy.
I purchased a cooker from Currys on the 23/09/21 & raised the fault on the 01/10/22 so out of warranty. I am getting absolutely no where with Currys even when quoting The Consumer Right Act. They are now saying they can arrange for an enginner to look at the oven @ a costs of £119.00 to see if its a manufacturing fault & if it is then they will repair and refund the £119.00. But why should I have to pay as oven is just over a year & the main element or thermostat is gone in the main oven ??
Hello Peter. It is normal for all retailers to insist on an engineer properly diagnosing any fault. No retailer can decide what to do without knowing exactly what has gone wrong. If you had an independent engineer’s report on the fault, they may accept that, but they will never accept the description of a fault that hasn’t been diagnosed by a proper engineer.
When they refer to refunding the engineer’s cost if it is found to be a manufacturing fault, one could argue they are being slightly disingenuous, because their engineer is not going to say it is a manufacturing fault. The engineer will merely find a fault, and that fault has occurred out of the 12-month guarantee period, and is therefore fully chargeable as far as they are concerned.
They are also only referring to an inherent fault. That is, a fault that was present when they sold it to you, a fault that is caused by a part being incorrectly manufactured or designed. This is very difficult to prove, and after the first 6 months have elapsed this proof has to be provided by the consumer. So unless you can get an independent engineer to write a report that says the fault is inherent, they will not accept it.
However, the consumer rights act does not just cover inherent faults. It also says that the products we buy should be fit for purpose, and should last a reasonable time. So your strongest argument is likely to be that it should not have failed after such a short time, and therefore is not of sufficient quality. But again, this is very often difficult to argue. This is where subjective judgement comes into play.
All of the relevant factors have to be considered. How much it cost, how it has been used (e.g. cooking for one person, cooking for family of 7), how serious is the fault? And how expensive? And how soon after purchase?
I would say that if a cooker was say, £200, and is installed in large family home, they might argue that it’s not unreasonable for a fault to have developed at this time, especially if it’s a relatively minor fault.
But if the cooker was £700, it would be much easier to argue that you should expect much better quality from such an expensive appliance. Likewise, if a major fault has developed, that is going to be extremely expensive to fix you could argue that this is unacceptable after such a short time.
Ultimately, on the surface, we appear to have a lot of very useful and sensible consumer rights in the UK. But in practice, the vast majority of people never get them because the people deciding the extent of our rights are the people who will financially lose out if they have to carry them out. It’s highly unsatisfactory. Of course, this is where consumer groups like Which? Citizens Advice and Resolver need to help us.
If you can’t successfully argue that it has not lasted a reasonable time, or been built to a reasonable standard then you need to contact one of the above for assistance. They would look at all of the facts, and advise you whether or not they feel you have a strong case or not.
Hi all.
I have a 13 month old dishwasher that is out of the 12 months warranty period that Indesit offer.
After a lot of back and forth, AO have agreed to consider a repair or replacement however, AO have asked me to pay for and supply a report and quote for repair. Once AO have this they will
Consider they options.
Am I liable to pay for the diagnosis or should this fall with AO to pick up the bill and arrange for the inspection?
Thanks in advance
Tomo
Hi Tomo. After 6 months, the onus is on the consumer to prove that a fault breaches the Consumer Rights Act. However, I would have thought if a report shows that the fault was inherent or it’s a serious fault that shouldn’t have happened then you should be able to claim the cost back from then. There’s no way you should lose out financially if a product has breached the Consumer Rights Act.
To replace or refund after the 12 month guarantee they would normally need to be satisfied there was an inherent fault or something serious or unepairable has happened.
Thanks for the advice and help.
Hi Andy,
I purchased a Ninja Foodi 15 in 1 – three months out of the 12 month warranty period – it’s not working. Ninja customer advisor said trouble shooting shows that it may need a new probe/jack – but not in stock and they don’t know when it will be back in stock. They offered 50% off a new appliance. Said they don’t offer repairs and can’t guarantee that probe/jack will resolve problem. Not risking buying a new one especially as it’s an expensive item. Other people have faced same issue – there are posts online and on Ninja website reviews for same item. They said they can’t replace item as it is out of the warranty period. Are there any consumer rights for this? As it is a common fault that people are experiencing round the 13 month mark?
Hello Mrs S. it sounds like you have a good case to request a replacement or refund from the retailer under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Repairs must be carried out within a reasonable time. Also, the appliance should be of sufficient quality, and should last for a reasonable time.
I would tell the retailer that not only has it not lasted a reasonable time before breaking down, but the manufacturer has so little confidence that they can repair it in anything like a reasonable time, that they have offered a heavy discount on a new one. They have also told you that they cannot even guarantee that this part, which they have no idea how long will take to obtain, will even fix the fault.
It’s important to remember that the manufacturer has no obligation to replace an appliance, only to repair it under its guarantee – although they too should do this within a reasonable time. The fact that they have offered to supply you a new one at 50% discounted price is strong evidence in your favour that you cannot get your appliance repaired in anything like a reasonable time. Which is unacceptable on a 13 month old product.
Hi Andy – thank you for your update. I will call them again.
Our drum has busted its a white knight dryer,ive been told its un repairable ,we’ve had it 4 years is there anything that currys can do thanks
Hello Ron. These things all depend upon how much they cost, and how they have been used. The average life expectancy of a tumble dryer should be about 10 years. So on that level it’s not even lasted half as long as you would expect. If an appliance is really cheap and doesn’t last very long, it might still be argued that it was reasonable value for money. For example, if a tumble dryer cost £150 and lasted 4 years it’s only £37.50 for each year, which could still be argued is pretty good value for money.
But if an appliance costs a few hundred pounds or more, then this increases the likelihood that it has been poor value for money and not lasted long enough for what it cost. This is especially true if it’s not even been used very heavily at all. So potentially you might have a good case that it has not lasted anywhere near as long as it should have and therefore you should be entitled to compensation from the seller. You may need to take advice from somewhere like citizens advice or Which?
Thank you very much for your reply , i will ask advice from citizens advice , you’ve bern very helpful