Washing performance ratings on eco labels
In my Washerhelp article on washing machine eco-labels ( What do the new energy labels mean? ) I commented on the washing performance rating section. This section was designed to point out which washing machines are the best at actually washing laundry. The best would be rated at A, and the worst would be rated six places down the scale at G. At the time of creating these eco-labels this was a good idea, we can now see which washing machines aren’t very good at washing and which ones are.
Unfortunately, as with most targets set, if achieving them is important enough or even necessary then they are often achieved by slightly underhand methods or at the expense of making something else not under such scrutiny suffer.
Laudable aims can end up a joke or even a travesty. The current situation, which has been the case for some time now, is that it is inconceivable for any washing machine to be produced that does not have an A washing performance rating. Therefore as virtually all washing machines have the A rating the system no longer tells us anything worthwhile.
What has happened is that manufacturers create washing machines with just one specific wash programme to be tested for the rating. They have ensured this program will pass the test, which ensures it gets the essential A washing performance rating. However, this wash programme is not necessarily one that most customers will use and it may take a ridiculous amount of time to complete the cycle. The result of this is that people are buying washing machines they believe will wash well enough to have been awarded an A washing performance rating without realising that the 40° cottons wash that most people use has not been tested at all, and could actually give a poor performance.
Why they chose to rate the washing machine on a 60° wash, which according to statistics hardly anybody uses these days I don’t know. Why they decided to award an A washing performance rating to any washing machine as long as just one wash programme achieves this status – even though the rest its wash programmes could be less than satisfactory I don’t know.
The current situation is that the wash rating award is not doing the job it was intended to do because all washing machines are now rated the same. Not only are they rated the same but they are rated only on special 60 degree wash programs but most consumers will assume the entire washing machine has been tested and deemed “A rated” on all washes.
Even the cheapest, budget washing machines with a poor reputation proudly boast they are A wash rated.
Until they come up with something better it’s best not to pay too much attention to it.
Related: Eco-labels suggestion (Not directly related to washing efficiency ratings but related to eco labels)
Written By - Washerhelp on July 24th, 2009 with
5 comments
__
Read More Articles on Washing Machines & Washer Dryers |
Subscribe | Please Report any broken links - pretty please :-)
Why not add your comment? click the comment link above or scroll down to the comments box


#1. July 24th, 2009, at 7:06 PM.
Hello Andy,
Going to start a good debate here!
Where to start, you are quite correct that the “A” wash rating is absolute rubbish , have researched this and only found 1 washing machine not to have it……..HEC priced at only £156.49, no wonder it is a “B”, at Argos. Now I know this is one of those cheap sh1te Chinese affairs! But all the others, even all cheapo Merlonis have an “A”! So you are qtite correct it tells you nothing!
I have a 15 year old Bosch and it washes and rinses FAR better than any modern machine you can buy today, mainly because of the high water usage. I had a Hotpoint proir to this and it was a new efficient model, it did NOT get clothes clean and the rinsing was abysmol. I wouldn’t have any modern machine again their performance like you say is tailored to economy not good cleaning and rinsing performance.
And on to the long cycle times, modern “A” rated washers wash in excess of one hour some even as long as two before they start to rinse, not only will this wear out the machine much quicker but will ruin you clothing bobbling it and removing the colour etc. Going back to my Bosch, it washes for no more than 20-40 minutes dependant on the temperature and cycle chosen, I have an “intensive” option button but it washes so well find it not to be needed. I am even able to wash alot of things with the “Short wash” button selected, meaning no more than a 20 minute wash! The rinsing and spin only take about 45 minutes meaning the programmes are very short and whats more wash better to!
Making machines wash for longer is bad for the environment because they wear out faster and with machines not being built like they used to be some don’t even make it past the warranty period, meaning more land fill. Also with spare parts being extortionate, virtually no body repairs them any more and they get thrown away! Throw away society springs to mind.
Like Andy clearly states washing machines are tested on “Cotton 60″ a very long high temperature wash, that no one uses! So they should test “Cotton 40″ the most commonly used cycle in Britain, they could test both! Some 60 cycles wash for in excess of 3 hours, thats 3 times longer than my Bosch.
Now on to this eco bandwagon trend of low temperature washing, this is less effective at removing dirt than say a 60 wash, so even longer cycles. But thats not really the issue, if you constantly wash at 30/40 degrees your poor washing machine will pay the price, it will get all gunked up and rot away the drum spider, meaning that at least once a month the 90/95 maintanence wash is needed with either a bleach containig powder or washing machine cleaner such as Maytag Affresh! If not its either engineer time or new washer time!!
Personally I wash 90% of things on Cotton 60 or Cotton economy 60, both good at killing bacteria in towels etc. Low temperatures do not kill bacteria, meaning not only you laundry may smell but your washer will some what HUM!!
Hope to recieve some comments on this, especially from Andy and Dave, should be very interesting!!
All the best
Oliver